Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance (MLSB<sub>i</sub>) among methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) from Libya

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance (MLSBi) among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Libya

Published: 13 January 2010

Citation: Libyan J Med 2010, 5: 4636 - DOI: 10.3402/ljm.v5i0.4636

Libyan J Med 2010. © 2010 M.O. Ahmed et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) first emerged as nosocomial pathogens in the early 1960s are of great concern to public health and highly reported in human clinical samples (1). There are major international concerns about rising levels of MRSA and multi-drug resistant S. aureus owing to the difficulties of treating infections and the ease with which MRSA spreads within hospitals (2). Until recently, most infections of MRSA were acquired primarily in hospital settings, but now MRSA is responsible for both hospital and community-acquired infections (1). The objective of this study was to investigate MRSA collected isolates for MLSB phenotypes, in particular inducible clindamycin resistance (MLSBi).

MRSA collected isolates of hospital-origin were further investigated at the Microbiology Department, Biotechnology Research Centre, Tripoli, Libya. One hundred and twenty-eight MRSA isolates were confirmed at species level as S. aureus by culturing onto mannitol salt agar (MSA) and API Staph test strips (bioMerieux). Confirmation as MRSA was by latex agglutination test for PBP2a and disc diffusion method against cefoxitin in accordance with British Society of Antimicrobials and Chemotherapy guidelines (BSAC) as described by Andrews (3). Isolates were also tested against erythromycin, clindamycin, and synercid for the characterization of MLSB phenotypic isolates. D-tests were performed on isolates exhibiting erythromycin resistance, to assay for the presence of inducible clindamycin resistance (MLSBi phenotype) as described by Fiebelkorn et al. (4).

Of the 128 tested MRSA isolates, 24.2% (n=31) were resistant to clindamycin, 63.2% (n=81) isolates were resistant to erythromycin, and 17.9% (n=23) were resistant to synercid. Twelve isolates (9.3%) exhibited MLSBc (constitutive) phenotype and D-tests identified six isolates (4.6%) with inducible resistance to clindamycin (MLSBi phenotype).

Clindamycin is an efficient and economic lincosamide drug used for the treatment of staphylococci infection (5). One macrolide resistance mechanism, modification of a drug binding site on the ribosome, results in resistance to macrolides, azalides, lincosamides, and group (B) streptogramins (MLSB). MLSB phenotypes can be either constitutive (MLSBc) or inducible (MLSBi). The inducible resistance to clindamycin (MLSBi) in MRSA can severely compromise therapy and can result in failure of clindamycin treatment of MRSA infections when non-suitable therapy (e.g. erythromycin) is given (6). MLSBi strains can be successfully treated with clindamycin; however MLSBi can complicate therapy when MLSBi phenotype-switching into MLSBc occurs possibly due to mutation, in the absence of macrolide inducers (6). Clindamycin can still be used for MRSA infections in our hospitals. (7) However, susceptibility testing for the detection of inducible resistance to clindamycin should be routinely performed (7, 8).

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Dr. Mohamed El Sherif the director of National Authority for Scientific Research, Tripoli, Libya for the unlimited support and Dr. Keith E. Baptiste from the University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Mohamed O. Ahmed
Department of Microbiology
Biotechnology Research Centre
Tripoli, Libya
and
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
AlFateh University
Tripoli, Libya
Email: mhmd73@lttnet.net

Mohamed H. Alghazali and Abdelalbaset R. Abuzweda
Department of Microbiology
Biotechnology Research Centre
Tripoli, Libya

Samira G. Amri
Burns and Plastic Surgery Centre
Tripoli, Libya

References

  1. Robinson JO, Pearson JC, Christiansen KJ, Coombs GW, Murray RJ. Community-associated versus healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a 10-year retrospective review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009; 28: 353–61. [Crossref]
  2. Gould IM. The clinical significance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect. 2005; 61: 277–82. [Crossref]
  3. Andrews JM. BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 5). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006; 58: 511–29. [Crossref]
  4. Fiebelkorn KR, Crawford SA, McElmeel ML, Jorgensen JH. Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41: 4740–4. [Crossref]
  5. Oguz VA, Yapar N, Sezak N, Cavus SA, Kurutepe S, Peksel H, et al. The rate of inducible clindamycin resistance and susceptibilities to other antimicrobial agents in staphylococci. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2009; 43: 37–44.
  6. Lewis JS, Jorgensen JH. Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococci: should clinicians and microbiologists be concerned? Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40: 280–5. [Crossref]
  7. El-Bouri K. Clinical microbiology services are essential for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of MRSA and other nosocomial pathogens in Libyan healthcare facilities. Libyan J Med. 2009; 4: 128–9. [Crossref]
  8. Zorgani A, Shawerf O, Tawil K, El-Turki E, Ghenghesh KS. Inducible clindamycin resistance among staphylococci isolated from burn patients. Libyan J Med. 2009; 4: 149–52. [Crossref]


Libyan Journal of Medicine eISSN 1819-6357, ISSN 1993-2820

This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License. Responsible editor: Omran Bakoush