Tooth brushing, tongue cleaning and snacking behaviour of dental technology and therapist students

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Tooth brushing, tongue cleaning and snacking behaviour of dental technology and therapist students

Clement C. Azodo1*, Adebola O. Ehizele1, Agnes Umoh2, Patrick I. Ojehanon2, Osagie Akhionbare2, Robinson Okechukwu3 and Lawrence Igbinosa1

1Department of Periodontics, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin, Nigeria; 2Department of Periodontics, University of Benin, Benin, Nigeria; 3Federal School of Dental Therapy and Dental Technology, Enugu, Nigeria

Abstract

Objective: To determine the tooth brushing, tongue cleaning and snacking behaviour of dental technology and therapist students.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study of students of Federal School of Dental Therapy and Technology Enugu, Nigeria. Self-administered questionnaire was used to obtain information on demography, frequency, duration and technique of tooth brushing and tongue cleaning as well as information on consumption of snacks.

Results: A total of 242 students responded. Dental technology students made up 52.5% of the respondents and dental therapist in training made up 47.5%. Majority (63.2%) of the respondents considered the strength of tooth brush when purchasing a tooth brush and 78.9% use tooth brushes with medium strength. Seven-tenth (71.9%) of the respondents brush their teeth twice daily and 52.1% brush for 3–5 minutes. About one-third (30.2%) brush their teeth in front of a mirror. Chewing stick was used by 51.7% of respondents in addition to the use of tooth brush. Tongue cleaning was done by 94.2% with only 9.5% using a tongue cleaner. Only 20.2% reported regular snacks consumption. Nine-tenth (90.4%) of respondents were previously involved in educating others, apart from their colleagues, on tooth brushing.

Conclusion: This survey revealed that most of the dental therapy and technology students had satisfactory tooth-brushing behaviour. The zeal to educate others about proper tooth brushing revealed in this study suggests that the students may be helpful in oral health promotion.

Keywords: toothbrushing; tongue cleaning; snacking behaviour; dental auxiliary students; Nigeria

Received: 9 April 2010; Accepted in revised form: 18 July 2010; Published: 12 August 2010

Citation: Libyan J Med 2010, 5: 5208 - DOI: 10.3402/ljm.v5i0.5208

Libyan J Med 2010. © 2010 Clement C. Azodo et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Introduction

Oral diseases exert a negative impact on an individual's quality of life and also represent a huge burden for healthcare systems worldwide (1). In many low-income countries, the burden of oral diseases is on the increase thus certifying it, a substantial health problem (2) with enormous consequences (3–8). Achieving optimal oral health through preventive efforts is a hallmark of the dental profession (9) and such efforts are geared towards encouraging patients to practice appropriate oral self-care behaviours (9). Achieving optimal oral and dental health requires a commitment to self-care, embracing preventive behaviours as well as the receipt of appropriate professional care. The improvement of personal oral health has been shown to be linked to dental education experience (10).

Dental health providers need to set a good example for their patients by maintaining good oral health since they influence their patients’ oral health-related behaviour (11). Dental auxiliary personnel's role in oral health promotion after graduation has been reported (12). Oral health practice of this group should be good and conform to professional recommendations.

Studies have also shown that dental students with positive oral health attitude are good models for oral health behaviour and serve as instructors to their friends, family members, patients and their society on how to maintain good oral health (13–16).

Dental therapists and dental technicians in training will contribute to the realisation of the oral health vision of Nigeria (17). This is because they are equipped with information necessary for oral health promotion. It is therefore important that their own oral health knowledge is good and that their oral health behaviour conforms to professional recommendations. With proper knowledge and oral health behaviour, they can play an important role in health education of individuals and groups (18–21), and act as role models for lay people and the community at large.

The objective of this study was to determine the tooth brushing, tongue cleaning and snacking behaviour of dental technicians and dental therapist in training. It was also to identify gaps in their oral health behaviour and suggest ways of filling them.

Materials and methods

A descriptive cross-sectional study of students of Federal School of Dental Therapy and Technology, Enugu, Nigeria was conducted using self-administered questionnaire. All the students in Year 1–4 were included in the study. Data was obtained on demography, frequency and duration of tooth brushing, texture of tooth brush, factors influencing choice of tooth brush, how often tooth brush is changed and why, the use of additional tooth cleaning agent, the practice of tongue cleaning and tongue cleaning agent used, frequency of snacking and types of snacks consumed.

Recruitment was voluntary. Prior to administration of questionnaire, the aim and nature of the study was explained to the participant and informed consent obtained. Students completed the questionnaire anonymously during normal class sessions. Approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics and Research Committee of the University of Benin Teaching Hospital.

Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS version 15.0) was used for data analysis. Frequency distribution and percentages were analysed and presented in tabular and graphic forms. Significance of differences was tested by χ2 test and P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 242 students responded with dental technology students constituting 52.5% and dental therapist students constituting 47.5%. Male:female ratio was 1:1.6. Majority (95.5%) of the respondents were single, in 20–25 year age group (75.2%) and 45% were in the first-year class.

About one-fifth (21.1%) of the respondents brushed their teeth once daily, 71.9% brushed their teeth twice daily and 5.8% brushed more than twice daily (Table 1). More than half (52.1%) spent 3–5 minutes brushing and 30.2% usually checked their teeth in the mirror after brushing (Table 1). Texture of tooth brush used by respondents were soft (17.4%), medium (78.9%) and hard (2.5%) (Table 1). About half (51.7%) also combined chewing stick and only 0.8% use dental floss. The main factors that influenced the choice of tooth brush was strength (63.2%), brand 12.8% and size (10.3%), cost (1.2%), combination of factors (4.2%), no special consideration (5.8%) and no response (2.5%) (Table 1).


Table 1. Frequency and duration of tooth brushing
Parameter Frequency (no.) Percentage (%)
Frequency of tooth brush
 Once   51 21.1
 Twice 174 71.9
 More than twice   14   5.8
 No response     2   0.8
Duration of tooth brushing
 1–3 min   57 23.6
 3–5 min 126 52.1
 >5 min   56 23.1
 No response     3   1.2
Use of mirror
 Yes   73 30.2
 No 164 67.8
 No response     5   2.1
Texture of tooth brush
 Soft 42 17.4
 Medium 191 78.9
 Hard     6   2.5
 No knowledge     1   0.4
 No response     2   0.8
Total 242 100.0

Four-tenth of the respondents replaced their tooth brush every 3 months. Fraying of tooth brushes was the most common reason for tooth brush replacement (Table 2).


Table 2. Frequency and reason for changing tooth brush
Parameter Frequency (no.) Percentage (%)
Frequency of changing tooth brush
 Every month 42 17.4
 Every 3 months 98 40.5
 Every 6 months 53 21.9
 >1 year   9   3.7
 Defective tooth brush 21   8.7
 Missing tooth brush   8   3.3
 No specific time   6   2.5
 No response   5   2.1
Reasons for changing tooth brush
 Frayed bristles 110 45.5
 Softening of bristle   70 28.9
 Colour faded   12   5.0
 Missing tooth brush     2   0.8
 Dentist's advice     1   0.4
 No special reason   34 14.0
 No response   13   5.4
Total 242 100.0

Tongue cleaning was carried out by 94.2%. The following were used for tongue cleaning: tooth brush (81.8%), tongue cleaner (9.5%), chewing stick (2.1%) and knife (0.8%).

Majority (66.1%) consumed snacks occasionally and only 20.2% reported regular snack consumption. Meat pie (46.7%) was the most common snack consumed followed by biscuits (18.2%), cakes (11.2%), others include egg roll, chin-chin, ice cream and fruits (Fig. 1). Majority (92.6%) expressed confidence in teaching people how to brush properly and 90.5% had done that in the past, of which 35.1% had discussed with everybody they knew, i.e. parents, siblings, other relatives, friends and neighbours (Table 3).


Fig. 1.  Frequency of snacking.


Table 3. Interpersonal communication on tooth brushing
Who Frequency Percentage (%)
Parents   14   5.8
Siblings   29 12.0
Relatives   10   4.1
Neighbour     4   1.7
Friends   45 18.6
Multiple group 115   47.5
No response   25   10.3
Total 242 100.0

Discussion

The frequency and duration of tooth brushing correlates with oral hygiene and oral health. Brushing twice daily for acceptable duration and the use of a mirror to visualise one's efforts appear to be part of an optimal oral self-care (22). Twice-daily brushing confers optimal effect on oral hygiene and gingival condition of both males and females (23). Twice-daily brushing is recommended by most dentists in order to improve plaque control, since most patients are not able to achieve sufficient plaque removal by performing oral hygiene measures at home (24).

In this study, majority of the students (71.9%) brushed twice daily and 52.1% brushed for 3–5 minutes. This is comparable with 68% twice or more daily brushing recorded among Turkish non-dental university students (25), lower than 81% among Mongolian dentists (26) but higher than what was recorded in many other similar studies (12, 27–30). In this study, female students reported brushing their teeth more frequently than their male counterpart. This is consistent with findings of other studies (22, 25, 31). Females have been said to have better oral health knowledge (32), to exhibit greater interest in oral health and to consider sound teeth more important than males (33, 34).

The texture of a tooth brush contributes to tooth wear lesion and its sequelae. Medium texture is the recommended strength. In this study, medium texture tooth brushes were the most frequently used and the most important factor considered when purchasing a tooth brush by the students was the texture. This shows that most of the students are conforming to the standard.

It has been documented that tooth brush with frayed bristles is ineffective for proper cleaning and also causes adverse effects like gingival recession and oral ulcer, and it was recommended that tooth brushes should be replaced every 3 months or when the bristles are frayed (19, 35, 36). In this study, 40.5% replaced their tooth brush every 3 months and the usual reason for tooth brush replacement was frayed bristles in 45.5% of respondents.

Chewing stick is known to contain antimicrobial agents which are beneficial for prevention and treatment of periodontal disease (37) but when not properly used it can cause tooth wear lesions. Some tooth brush users believe that the use of chewing stick in addition to tooth brushing is the most effective way of reducing mouth debris (38). A study even concluded that the chewing stick is more effective than tooth brushing for reducing plaque and gingivitis, when preceded by professional instruction on its correct application (39). It has also been said that the use of chewing stick appears to be more effective than tooth brushing for removal of plaque from the embrasures, thus enhancing interproximal health (39). The additional tooth cleaning method used by 51.7% of respondents in this study is chewing stick. The use of dental floss was minimal and this is similar to the findings of Kirtiloglu et al. (25).

Tongue cleaning is a component of oral hygiene measure, as tongue coating is known to be the predominantly implicated cause of halitosis (40, 41). Several volatile sulphur compound producing bacteria have the ability to colonise the dorsum of the tongue in periodontally healthy subjects (42) and they are reduced by tongue cleaning (43, 44). In this study, tongue cleaning was carried out by majority using the tooth brush and only 9.5% used the tongue cleaner.

Increased snacking frequency and inadequate tooth-brushing have been identified as predisposing factors for tooth decay (28). Regular snack consumption was practiced by 20.2%. This percentage is fewer than what was reported previously in other studies (11, 45).

The dental auxiliaries have been said to play an important role in educating their friends, family members, patients and their society on how to maintain good oral health (18–21). Respondents in this study will be able to carry out this role as 92.6% expressed confidence in teaching people how to brush their teeth and 90.5% are presently actively discussing issues on tooth brushing with parents, siblings, other relatives, friends and neighbours.

Conclusion

The level of oral self-care behaviour of the dental therapist and dental technology students is satisfactory, but there is room for improvement of tooth brushing and dietary habits in relation to snacking. The zeal to educate others about proper tooth brushing revealed in this study suggests that these students may also be helpful in promoting oral health promotion.

Conflict of interest and funding

The authors have not received any funding or benefits from industry to conduct this study.

References

  1. Tanwir F. Absence of toothache syndrome oral health and treatment needs among urban Pakistanis. Doctor's Thesis, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; 2008.
  2. Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, Ndiaye C. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull World Health Organ. 2005; 83: 661–9.
  3. Acs G, Shulman R, Ng MW, Chussid S. The effect of dental rehabilitation on the body weight of children with early childhood caries. Pediatr Dent. 1999; 21: 109–13.
  4. Filstrup SL, Briskie D, da Fonseca M, Lawrence L, Wandera A, Inglehart M. Early childhood caries and quality of life: child and parent perspectives. Pediatr Dent. 2003; 25: 431–40.
  5. Kwan S, Petersen PE. Oral health promotion: an essential element of a health-promoting school. Geneva: WHO; 2003. Available from: http://www.who.int/oral_health/publications/doc11/en/ [cited 2 November 2008].
  6. Sheiham A. Oral health, general health and quality of life. Bull World Health 2005; 83: 641–720.
  7. Department of Health. Choosing better oral health: an oral health plan for England. London: Department of Health; 2005. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4123251/ [cited 2 November 2008].
  8. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's health 2006. AIHW Cat. No. AUS 73. Canberra: AIHW; 2006.
  9. Ramsay DS. Patient compliance with oral hygiene regimens: a behavioural self-regulation analysis with implications for technology. Int Dent J. 2000: 304–11.
  10. Cortes FJ, Nevot C, Ramon JM, Cuenca E. The evolution of dental health in dental students at the University of Barcelona. J Dent Educ. 2002; 66: 1203–8.
  11. Ghasemi H, Murtomaa H, Vehkalahti MM, Torabzadeh H. Determinants of oral health behaviour among Iranian dentists. Int Dent J. 2007; 57: 237–42.
  12. Al-Ansari J, Honkala E, Honkala S. Oral health knowledge and behavior among male health sciences college students in Kuwait. BMC Oral Health 2003; 3: 2. [Crossref]
  13. Al-Wahadni AM, Al-Omiri MK, Kawamura M. Differences in self-reported oral health behavior between dental students and dental technology/dental hygiene students in Jordan. J Oral Sci. 2004; 46: 191–7. [Crossref]
  14. Al-Omari QD, Hamasha AA. Gender-specific oral health attitudes and behavior among dental students in Jordane. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 1: 107–14.
  15. Nusair KB, Alomari Q, Said K. Dental health attitudes and behaviour among dental students in Jordan. Community Dent Health. 2006; 23: 147–51.
  16. Peker I, Alkurt MT. Oral health attitudes and behavior among a group of Turkish dental students. Eur J Dent 2009; 3: 24–31.
  17. Akpata ES. Oral health in Nigeria. Int Dent J. 2004; 54: 361–6.
  18. Uitenbrock DG, Schauls RMM, Tromp JAH, Kaut JH. Dental hygienists’ influence on the patients’ knowledge, motivation, self-care, and perception of change. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1989; 17: 87–90. [Crossref]
  19. Abraham NJ, Cirincione UK, Glass RT. Dentists’ and dental hygienists’ attitudes toward tooth brush replacement and maintenance. Clin Prev Dent. 1990; 12: 28–33.
  20. McGonaughy FL, Lucken KM, Toevs SE. Health promotion behaviors of private practice dental hygienists. J Dent Hyg. 1991; 65: 222–30.
  21. Brown LF. A comparison of patients attending general dental practices employing or not employing dental hygienists. Aust Dent J. 1996; 41: 47–52. [Crossref]
  22. Khami MR, Virtanen JI, Jafarian M, Murtomaa H. Oral health behaviour of Iranian dental school educators. Oral Health Prev Dent 2006; 4: 265–71.
  23. Barenie JT, Leske GS, Ripa LW. The effect of tooth brushing frequency on oral hygiene and gingival health in school children: reassessment after two and one-half years. J Public Health Dent. 1976; 36: 9–16. [Crossref]
  24. Attin T, Hornecker E. Tooth brushing and oral health: how frequently and when should tooth brushing be performed? Oral Health Prev Dent 2005; 3: 135–40.
  25. Kirtiloglu T, Yavuz US. An assessment of oral self-care in the student population of a Turkish university. Public Health. 2006; 120: 953–7. [Crossref]
  26. Tseveenjav B, Vehkalahti M, Murtomaa H. Oral health and its determinants among Mongolian dentists. Acta Odontol Scand. 2004; 62: 1–6. [Crossref]
  27. Ayanbadejo PO, Sofola OO. Primary oral preventive practices: knowledge and practice among College of Medicine University of Lagos students. Niger J Health Biomed Sci. 2005; 4: 130–3.
  28. Udoye CI, Aguwa EN. Oral health related knowledge and behaviour among nursing students at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu. J Coll Med. 2007; 12: 13–7.
  29. Ghasemi H, Murtomaa H, Vehkalahti MM, Torabzadeh H. Determinants of oral health behaviour among Iranian dentists. Int Dent J. 2007; 57: 237–42.
  30. Pack AR. Dental services and needs in developing countries. Int Dent J. 1998; 48: 239–47.
  31. Khami MR, Virtanen JI, Jafarian M, Murtomaa H. Oral health behaviour and its determinants amongst Iranian dental students. Eur J Dent Educ. 2007; 11: 42–7. [Crossref]
  32. Al-Ansari JM, Honkala S. Gender differences in oral health knowledge and behavior of the health science college students in Kuwait. Gender differences in oral health knowledge and behavior of the health science college students in Kuwait. 2007; 36: 41–6.
  33. Ostberg AL, Halling A, Lindblad U. Gender differences in knowledge, attitude, behavior and perceived oral health among adolescents. Acta Odontol Scand 1999; 57: 231–6. [Crossref]
  34. Ostberg AL, Halling A, Lindblad U. A gender perspective of self-perceived oral health in adolescents: associations with attitudes and behaviours. Community Dent Health. 2001; 18: 110–6.
  35. Leichter J, Pack AR. The attitudes of New Zealand dentists and dental hygienists towards toothbrushes and toothbrushing. J N Z Soc Periodontol. 1999; 84: 14–7.
  36. Daly CG, Marshall RI, Lazarus R. Australian dentists’ views on tooth brush wear and renewal. Aust Dent J. 2000; 45: 254–6. [Crossref]
  37. Al-Otaibi M. The miswak (chewing stick) and oral health. Studies on oral hygiene practices of urban Saudi Arabians. Swed Dent J Suppl. 2004; 167: 2–75.
  38. Tubaishat RS, Darby ML, Bauman DB, Box CE. Use of miswak versus tooth brushes: oral health beliefs and behaviours among a sample of Jordanian adults. Int J Dent Hyg. 2005; 3: 126–36. [Crossref]
  39. Al-Otaibi M, Al-Harthy M, Söder B, Gustafsson A, Angmar-Månsson B. Comparative effect of chewing sticks and tooth brushing on plaque removal and gingival health. Oral Health Prev Dent 2003; 1: 301–7.
  40. Miyazaki H, Sakao S, Katoh Y, Takehara T. Correlation between volatile sulphur compounds and certain oral health measurements in the general population. J Periodontol. 1995; 66: 679–84.
  41. Wåler SM. On the transformation of sulfur-containing amino acids and peptides to volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) in the human mouth. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997; 105: 534–7. [Crossref]
  42. Kishi M, Kimura S, Ohara-Nemoto Y, Kishi K, Aizawa F, Moriya T, et al. Oral malodour and periodontopathic microorganisms in tongue coat of periodontally healthy subjects. Dent Jpn. 2002; 38: 24–8.
  43. Outhouse TL, Al-Alawi R, Fedorowicz Z, Keenan JV. Tongue scraping for treating halitosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; CD005519.
  44. Outhouse TL, Fedorowicz Z, Keenan JV, Al-Alawi R. 2006 A Cochrane systematic review finds tongue scrapers have short-term efficacy in controlling halitosis. Gen Dent; 54: 352–9, 360, 367–8, quiz 360.
  45. Okeigbemen SA. The prevalence of dental caries among 12 to 15-year-old school children in Nigeria: report of a local survey and campaign. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2004; 2: 27–31.

*Clement C. Azodo
Department of Periodontics
University of Benin Teaching Hospital
Benin, Nigeria
Email: clementazodo@yahoo.com

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Bookmark and Share


Libyan Journal of Medicine eISSN 1819-6357, ISSN 1993-2820

This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License. Responsible editor: Omran Bakoush